Jump to content

Talk:Charlemagne

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleCharlemagne has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You KnowOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 5, 2006Good article nomineeListed
June 14, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 7, 2006WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
May 9, 2007WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
June 7, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
June 7, 2024Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
March 24, 2024Good article nomineeNot listed
June 21, 2024Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 17, 2024.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Charlemagne owned an elephant that he received as a gift from the Abbasid caliph Harun al-Rashid?
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 25, 2004, December 25, 2005, December 25, 2006, December 25, 2007, December 25, 2008, December 25, 2009, and April 2, 2022.
Current status: Good article

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Jumpy542 talk 22:50, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Source: Paul E. Dutton, Charlemagne's Mustache: And Other Cultural Clusters of a Dark Age, pp. 59-61
  • Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by Seltaeb Eht (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Seltaeb Eht (talk) 23:43, 22 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: The hook and the article have no problems; this is my second review, so take my opinion with a grain of salt. TheNuggeteer (talk) 03:20, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To Prep 1


[edit]

I don’t know if this has been discussed or not but aren’t all Europeans or people of European descent related Charlemagne?

I have been seeing sources talk about this nonstop. But I don’t seem to see it anywhere in the article.CycoMa2 (talk) 21:37, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's the least notable thing about the guy. I imagine most of the individuals in 9th-century Europe who became parents are direct ancestors of a large chunk of the present-day European population. Remsense ‥  21:45, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I can definitely see that. But still I have seen tons of sources mention this or talk about this.
here
here
I just can’t seem to find an article about this and don’t know if any Wikipedia articles touch on this or not. When this thing appears to mentioned a lot in various sources.CycoMa2 (talk) 21:52, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am aware of Royal Descent page. But either I am too busy with school work or I don’t see any mention of most Europeans being descendants of Charlemagne.
Except this:
There has been a long tradition for royalty predominantly to intermarry those of their own class. As a result, the ruling houses of Europe have tended to be closely related to one another, and descent from a particular monarch will be found in many dynasties – all present European monarchs, and a great many pretenders, are genealogical descendants of William the Conqueror (1028–1087), for example, and further back in time of Charlemagne(742/747/748–814). Through Charlemagne, some researchers have even speculated on descent from antiquity.
The practice of restrictive marriages has been noted as increasing over the years until the 20th century: the passage of time strengthened the conviction that royalty only allied with royalty, and from the 16th century marriages between royal and commoner became rarer and rarer. This is one reason why descent from more recent monarchs is rarer amongst commoners than from monarchs further back.
Members of untitled families today may be descended from illegitimate children of royalty. Seldom permitted to marry into other royal families, these children tended to marry into upper-class or middle-class families within their own countries.
CycoMa2 (talk) 22:12, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
But I don’t think it directly says most Europeans are descendants of him.CycoMa2 (talk) 22:17, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wait did I misread your reply. Forgive me I doing school work while doing this.CycoMa2 (talk) 22:35, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Remove section on "Veneration".

[edit]

"Charlemagne has been the subject of artworks, monuments and literature during and after the medieval period and is venerated by the Catholic Church."

The veneration could be doubted as in "Held in respect" had it not linked directly to the page on beatification.

The actions of an Anti-Pope do not reflect on the Catholic Church and her official teachings. The beatification on an individual must be done with the permission of the Holy See, and as Paschal III was an Anti-Pope, this condition was not met. Therefore, he was not Venerated by the Catholic Church in the sense where "Veneration" is related to the state of Beatification. Cleric of Vecna (talk) 16:47, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Birthplace

[edit]

The old version claimed Charlemagne was born in Aachen, Germany or Herstal (in present-day Belgium), which was contrary to the current Wikipedia page, whereas the Frankish palaces in Vaires-sur-Marne and Quierzy have also been proposed as possible birthplaces in the current version. Alleged editor (talk) 13:54, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The current version takes into consideration the latest scholarship, instead of solely relying on much older works. --Obenritter (talk) 20:24, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In fact, the | version from before I started my rewrite made the claim of Aachen or Herstal (along with Quierzy and Prüm) with no citation. Seltaeb Eht (talk) 17:42, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Name pronunciation

[edit]

What is the source for the name pronunciation? I feel like it is wrong - the original french pronunciation does not end in "main" but in something closer to "ma-nie". I don't know the rules about default pronunciation on Wikipedia (do we take that of original language or wiki language?), so this might be the english vernacular pronunciation - but even if it is the case, I don't think you're supposed to say "charle-main" in english? DommageCritique (talk) 06:08, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]