Jump to content

Runaway Jury

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Runaway Jury
Theatrical release poster
Directed byGary Fleder
Screenplay by
Based onThe Runaway Jury
by John Grisham
Produced by
Starring
CinematographyRobert Elswit
Edited by
Music byChristopher Young
Production
companies
Distributed by20th Century Fox
Release date
  • October 17, 2003 (2003-10-17)
Running time
127 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$60 million
Box office$80.2 million

Runaway Jury is a 2003 American legal thriller film directed by Gary Fleder and starring John Cusack, Gene Hackman, Dustin Hoffman and Rachel Weisz.

An adaptation of John Grisham's 1996 novel The Runaway Jury, the film pits lawyer Wendell Rohr (Hoffman) against shady jury consultant Rankin Fitch (Hackman), who uses unlawful means to stack the jury with people sympathetic to the defense. Meanwhile, a high-stakes cat-and-mouse game begins when juror Nicholas Easter (Cusack) and his girlfriend Marlee (Weisz) appear to be able to sway the jury to deliver any verdict they want in a trial against a gun manufacturer.

The film was released on October 17, 2003. It is Hackman's penultimate film.[1]

Plot

[edit]

In New Orleans on an October morning, disgruntled ex-employee, Kevin Peltier walks into the stock brokerage firm and perpetrates a mass shooting. During opening statements it is revealed that eleven people are killed and five others critically wounded before Peltier then fatally turned the gun on himself. Among those killed was Jacob Wood, a broker at the firm. Two years later, his widow Celeste, along with her attorney Wendall Rohr, sue Vicksburg Firearms for gross negligence that caused her husband's death.

During jury selection, jury consultant Rankin Fitch (revealed to have ties with Vicksburg) and his team use electronic surveillance to gather background information on the jury pool. They feed info to defense attorney Durwood Cable while he is in the courtroom.

Nick Easter, who lives in a grungy apartment building, receives a jury notice. He goes to a magic store appearing to find a hex candle to avoid jury service. At an outdoor table, he and a group of friends discuss entering an online championship game for a $100,000 prize. Nick spots undercover operatives surrounding the outdoor venue where many potential jurors are eating and can be overheard talking. In court, Nick asks to be dismissed so he can participate in the online contest that takes place the same time as the trial; Judge Harkin refuses, which is actually what Nick wanted. Nick's congenial manner gains the attention he wants from the other jurors.

Meanwhile, on his illegal surveillance tape, Fitch notices Nick's photo on the wall behind the Judge's bench. Later that night, Nick and his girlfriend, celebrate his being chosen as a juror. On the bedroom wall, they have a photo board and background on each juror. They discuss their plan to sway the jury and make up to $15 million.

The jury tampering is elaborate as Nick uses tactics and his rising popularity among his fellow jurors to disrupt normal procedures. Elsewhere, someone calling herself Marlee calls attorneys for the defense and for the victim, Fitch and Rohr. She offers to deliver the desired verdict to the first bidder. Rohr dismisses the offer, assuming it is Fitch's tactic to obtain a mistrial. Fitch wants proof that she can deliver, which she provides by asking if he "feels patriotic" and then demonstrates her command by having the jurors spontaneously recite the pledge of allegiance at the start of the next court session.

By observing the jurors' behavior through the concealed cameras, Fitch identifies Nick as the influencer and has his apartment searched though nothing is found. Marlee retaliates by getting one of Fitch's jurors bounced, so Fitch blackmails three jurors.

This leads Rikki Coleman, a juror who wants her abortion kept secret, to attempt suicide. Fitch also sends men to find a concealed storage unit with key juror information in Nick's apartment, after which they burn it. When Nick shows the judge footage of Fitch's men breaking into his apartment, the jury is sequestered.

Rohr's key witness, a former Vicksburg employee, does not show up. After confronting Fitch, Rohr decides that he cannot win the case. He asks his firm's partners for $10 million to pay Marlee. On principle, Rohr refuses to pay, electing to take his chances against Fitch while keeping his conscience clear.

After the CEO of Vicksburg Firearms loses his temper under cross-examination, making a bad impression on the jury, Fitch agrees to pay Marlee to be certain of the verdict. Fitch sends an operative, Janovich, to kidnap Marlee, who fights him off and raises the price to $15 million.

Fitch's subordinate Doyle, who is investigating Nick, finds that he is actually Jeff Kerr, a law-school dropout. He travels to Gardner, Indiana, where both Jeff and his law-school girlfriend Gabby (Marlee) come from.

Doyle quizzes Gabby's mother, who reveals that Gabby's sister died in a shooting years before when she was in high school. At the time, the town of Gardner sued the manufacturer of the guns used and lost. Fitch had helped the defense win the case. Doyle calls Fitch to warn him that Nick and Marlee's offer is a setup, but it is too late. The money has already been paid.

After receiving confirmation of the payment, Nick asks the other jurors to review the facts, saying they owe it to Celeste Wood to deliberate. This triggers Herrera into a rant against the plaintiff, which undermines any support he had from the other jurors. The gun manufacturer is found liable, with the jury awarding $1 million in special damages and $110 million in general damages to Celeste Wood.

After the trial, Nick and Marlee confront Fitch with a receipt for the $15 million bribe, which they will make public unless he retires. Fitch asks Nick how he got the jury to vote for the plaintiff. Nick replies that he did not, explaining that he stopped Fitch from stealing the trial merely by getting the jury to vote with their hearts. Nick and Marlee inform an indignant Fitch that the $15 million "fee" will benefit the shooting victims in Gardner, leaving Fitch ranting that Nick and Marlee won't be able to stop and will both end up with nothing.

While Rohr is on his way with Celeste and her son to a celebratory meal, Rohr sees Nick and Marlee watching children play. They exchange acknowledging looks, and Rohr smiles. He leaves as Marlee and Nick decide to return home to Gardner.

Cast

[edit]

In addition, Dylan McDermott has an uncredited cameo as Jacob Wood, whose murder sets the plot in motion.

Production

[edit]

The rights to make an adaptation of John Grisham's 1996 novel The Runaway Jury,[2] were purchased in August 1996 by Arnon Milchan and distribution partner Warner Bros. for a record $8 million, including first-look rights to Grisham's next novel.[3] Directors slated to helm the picture included Joel Schumacher and Mike Newell, with the lead offered to Edward Norton and Will Smith.[4] After the release of the 1999 film, The Insider, which, as does the novel, focuses on big tobacco, the studio decided to make the plaintiff sue a gun company instead in the film adaptation.[4] This is Gene Hackman's and Dustin Hoffman's first and only film together. At the Pasadena Playhouse, they were classmates, and were both voted "Least Likely to Succeed."

Reception

[edit]

Box office

[edit]

Runaway Jury grossed $49.4 million domestically (United States and Canada) and $30.7 million in other territories, for a worldwide total of $80.2 million, against a budget of $60 million.[5] It opened at No. 3, in its first of four consecutive weeks in the Top 10 at the domestic box office.[6]

Critical response

[edit]

On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, 73% of 161 critics' reviews are positive, with an average rating of 6.6/10. The website's consensus reads: "An implausible but entertaining legal thriller."[7] Metacritic, which uses a weighted average, assigned the film a score of 61 out of 100, based on 38 critics, indicating "generally favorable" reviews.[8]

Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times gave the film three stars out of four, and stated that the plot to sell the jury to the highest-bidding party was the most ingenious device in the story, because it avoided pitting the "evil" and the "good" protagonists directly against each other in a stereotypical manner, but it plunged both of them into a moral abyss.[9]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Howie, Guy (March 2025). "Gene Hackman's Last Crime Thriller With 73% On Rotten Tomatoes Is Now Streaming On Netflix". Screen Rant. Retrieved March 9, 2025.
  2. ^ Mitchell, Elvis (2003-10-17). "Film Review; Courtroom Confrontation With Lots of Star Power". Movies. The New York Times. p. E25. Archived from the original on 2024-09-07. Retrieved 2025-02-27.
  3. ^ Carver, Benedict (August 30, 1996). "Holding Court". Screen International. p. 16.
  4. ^ a b "The Runaway Jury". Entertainment Weekly. 2003-08-14. Archived from the original on 2012-10-18. Retrieved 2023-12-18.
  5. ^ "Runaway Jury". Box Office Mojo. IMDb. Retrieved 2025-02-27.Edit this at Wikidata
  6. ^ "Runaway Jury | Domestic Weekly". Box Office Mojo. IMDb. Retrieved 2025-02-27.
  7. ^ "Runaway Jury". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango Media. Retrieved February 27, 2025. Edit this at Wikidata
  8. ^ "Runaway Jury". Metacritic. Fandom, Inc. Retrieved 2025-02-27.
  9. ^ Ebert, Roger (2003-10-17). "Runaway Jury". Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved 2025-02-27 – via RogerEbert.com.
[edit]